There is something about Club of Rome to systems thinking that is similar to the Dijkstra's observation about Basic and programming.

Articles debunking them are always full of fundamental misunderstandings about the discipline. (The ones supporting them are obviously wrong.) And people focusing on understanding the discipline never actually refer to them in any way.

That's because its much easier to write an article dissing on a discipline if you don't really understand any of it.

Time for me to author my devastating takedown of micro-botany…