Welp. You caught me. And I appreciate your point.
I still might batch process all my notes to break at words up to 72 characters anyway! But I’ll be mindful to where safety goggles and proofread before grinding axes in public.
And I’m leaving the typo above in situ so as not to mislead you that I’m less prone to error under normal circumstances. I’m a WIP.
Not at all my point to "catch" you, just to demonstrate that some of the claimed benefits are not really there.
We all make typos regardless of the editing format: for some cases it might be better to go with these "semantic line breaks", for others not so much.
While an interesting thought experiment, it should be obvious that claims are not objectively true.
Perhaps a full-on scientific study is in order? :)