Surely that's the fault of the purchaser setting the cap too low.
Maybe rather than completely stopping the service, it'd be better to rate limit the service when approaching/reaching the cap.
Surely that's the fault of the purchaser setting the cap too low.
Maybe rather than completely stopping the service, it'd be better to rate limit the service when approaching/reaching the cap.
Using that logic, isn’t it the fault of the user to set up an app without rate limiting?
It's misleading to promote a free tier that can then incur huge charges without being able to specify a charge cap.
If it can incur any charges at all then it isn't free.