However, "imamat" by itself is a generic term, so it's not clear why it should be controlled by a single organization that happens to have it in the name.
However, "imamat" by itself is a generic term, so it's not clear why it should be controlled by a single organization that happens to have it in the name.
Given that this discussion was started by someone mentioning only these 3 related things, I'd guess that the motivation might a negative one.
And indeed, the KSA rep has opposed it:
https://slate.com/technology/2012/08/icann-top-level-domain-...
Aren't there tons of generic terms gTLD controlled by a single organizations now?
I've just learned here that .man is owned/controlled by the MAN group
edit: source: https://icannwiki.org/.man
also: walmart applied for .george https://icannwiki.org/.george