This is true, but I've never heard of a use case. To which you might reply, "doesn't mean there isn't one," which you would be also right about.
Maybe you know one.
This is true, but I've never heard of a use case. To which you might reply, "doesn't mean there isn't one," which you would be also right about.
Maybe you know one.
I presume your definition of use case is something that doesn't include what people normally use it for. And I presume me using it for coding every day is disqualified as well.
I didn't mean to suggest it has no utility at all. That's obviously wrong (same for crypto). I meant a use case in line with the projections the companies have claimed (multiple trillions). Help with basic coding (of which efficiency gains are still speculative) is not a multi-trillion dollar business.