> claude doesn't really know anything other than it's training data
I've seen cases where Claude demonstrates novel behaviors or combines existing concepts in new ways based on my input. I don't think it's as simple as memorization anymore.
> claude doesn't really know anything other than it's training data
I've seen cases where Claude demonstrates novel behaviors or combines existing concepts in new ways based on my input. I don't think it's as simple as memorization anymore.
If I am standing in Finland and look out on the ocean, and the whole sky is green... Is the sky actually green?
You're equating your own perspective as objective truth, which is a very common pitfall and fallacy