Sensationalist, alarmist, b.s. article.

It emphasizes "AI adoption linked to 13% decline," which implies causation. The study itself only claims "evidence consistent with the hypothesis."

The article also largely highlights job loss for young workers, while only briefly mentioning cases where AI complements workers.

The study's preliminary status -- it is not peer reviewed -- is noted but only once and at end. If the article was more balanced it would have noted this at the beginning.

Articles on the same subject by the World Economic Forum, McKinsey, and Goldman Sachs are more balance and less alarmist.