Okay but noticeably he invents two numbers then pretends that a third number is irrelevant in order to claim that each model (which is not a company) is a profitable company.

You'd think maybe the CEO might be able to give a ball park on the profit made off that 2023 model.

ETA: "You paid $100 million... There's some cost to inference with the model, but let's just assume ... that even if you add those two up, you're kind of in a good state."

You see this right? He literally says that if you assume revenue exceeds costs then it's profitable. He doesn't actually say that it does though.