> It is sold cheap as they make money on volume and an optimized supply chain.
What about all the money that they make from abusive practices like refusing to integrate with competitors' products thus forcing you to buy their ecosystem, phoning home to run any app, high app store fees even on Mac OS, and their massive anti repair shenanigans?
Macs today are not designed to be easily repairably but instead to be lighter and otherwise better integrated - I believe that is consequence of consumer preferences and not shady business practices.
As for the services - it is a bit off topic as I believe Apple makes a profit on their macs alone ignoring their services business. But in general I have less of a problem with a subscription / fee-driven services business compared to an advertisement-based one. And as for the fee / alternative payment controversy (epic vs apple etc.) this is something that is relevant if you are a big brand that can actually market on your own / build an alternative shop infrastructure. For small time developers the marketing and payment infrastructure the apple app store offers is a bargain.
Macbooks are one of the heaviest laptops you can buy. I think they are doing it for the premium feel - it is extremely sturdy. I recently got some random lenovo YOGA for linux to go along side my macbook and it weighs less, is as thin and even has dedicated gpu - while having 2 user replaceable M.2 slots. It is also very sturdy but not as sturdy Macbooks.
What i am saying is that Apple could for sure fit replaceable drives without any change hit to size or weight. But their Mac strategy is price based on disk size and make repairs expensive so you buy new machine. I don't complain it is the reason why cheapest Macbook Air is the best laptop deal.
But let's stop this marketing story that it's their engineering genius not their market strategy.
>Macbooks are one of the heaviest laptops you can buy.
I don't think this is even close to true. My last laptop from 2020 weighed at ~2.6kg and it's 2025 counterpart is still at 2.1kg, while my work m1 mac is at 1.3kg
>. I think they are doing it for the premium feel - it is extremely sturdy
It's not merely a feel; I've succesfully thrown it to the pavement more than once from ~1.5 meters and it's continued working well, whereas none of my previous laptops have gotten away scot free before from even one drop
Apple does practice very hard repairability which I agree should be made much more accessible.
My Asus is all metal, thinner, and lighter than my same-screen-size MacBook
It's also not as robust. But it's definitely thinner and lighter.
I am pretty sure it is a consequence of consumer preference. I can see it from my own behaviour - I am a power user of all things computing and it has been decades since I upgraded a harddisk.
Regarding storage, part of the advantage of their soldered storage is higher access speeds. Combined with the fact that, as you note, people rarely need to upgrade their storage, might as well use the faster storage. This is probably particularly a benefit for the 8 GB machines, which I assume use swap regularly.
Exactly what competitors products on the Mac don’t they integrate with? And no serious app distributes through the Mac App Store.
Both the Mac and the iPhone support standard Bluetooth protocols and USB protocols.