hey! that's awesome to hear, thanks for the feedback.

we've tried a lot of things to make code more in-line with our paradigms (initially tried a few agents to parse out "project rules" from existing code, then used that in the system prompt), but have found that the agents tend to go off-track regardless. the highest leverage has just been changing the model (Claude writes code a certain way which we tend to prefer, vs GPT, etc) and a few strong system prompts (NEVER WRITE COMMENTS, repeated twice).

so the questions here are less about that, but more about overall functional / system requirements, and acknowledging that for stylistic things, the user will still have to review.