I don't know about the "no judges" part, but considering you put "no transparency," I assume you're trying to dispute that part too. In that case, could you explain the lack of a first-party list of blocked domains and the change in censor responses?
I'm not an expert in this stuff, especially not in Germany. My intent with including both "no judges" and "no transparency" was that those were the claims I found surprising in the original blog post. In my opinion, if either of those two claims are false, both lose all credibility. The author gets sorted into my mental bucket of "cooky conspiracy nuts".