Other protesters also have said some vile things about other people and it's allowed to go on. So it seems that the law isn't applied evenly.

In any case, people should be able to protest and should only face lawful restrictions if they cause immediate property damage (looting, burning cars, etc.), physical assault or pose an immediate danger to people or things in their immediate vicinity.

Just saying vile and disgusting things should not be a basis for prohibiting and or arresting people. If they become physically violent or threatening, then sure, arrest them. "Shitposting" on X/Twitter, etc., should not get you arrested.

People in China know the consequences of not being able to say vile and disgusting things about their own government when they crush dissent.

> Other protesters also have said some vile things about other people and it's allowed to go on. So it seems that the law isn't applied evenly.

For example: The now-suspended councillor, wearing a black polo top and surrounded by cheering supporters, said: “They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.” - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/08/15/suspended-labour... (unpaywall: https://archive.is/gT2fa)

He was charged, but the jury took little more than half an hour to reach a not guilty verdict. Speculation is that this was simple in-group preference - The trial was at Snaresbrook Crown Court, in the constituency of Leyton and Wanstead. At the 2021 Census, the white British population in Leyton and Wanstead was less than 34% of the total population. The jury likely reflected that. And such in-group preference is well documented: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/judicial-institute/sites/judicial-inst...

> So it seems that the law isn't applied evenly.

Of course. It is applied by humans, with all the failings that implies.

>In any case, people should be able to protest and should only face lawful restrictions if they cause immediate property damage ... Just saying vile and disgusting things should not be a basis for prohibiting and or arresting people.

That may be your viewpoint, but UK law says otherwise.

All the failings occur on one side, then it’s not an issue of human error

It's, to borrow a locally inspired term of a local socialist, "Orwellian." It's a bit ironic.

Are you saying that because Orwell was a socialist? Not so re he's local though.