It should be required to run these tests for these libraries. It's really frustrating to have to discover it trying to make it work.
It should be required to run these tests for these libraries. It's really frustrating to have to discover it trying to make it work.
CSS coverage is stated in [1]. It should be required to do minimal assessment before entitledly posting on HN.
[1]: https://github.com/plutoprint/plutobook/blob/main/FEATURES.m...
I'm not sure your point. CSS print conformance is extremely complex. There is a fairly well known open source test suite, that's fully dynamic, that can be run with visual outputs, fail/pass metrics etc. That would give an interested new user a much better grounding if the library is worth using, considering there are already several other options.