What I call backwards is Mozilla paying their executives multi-millions of dollars for failure and the decline of Firefox.

Maybe had they ran the company competently, they could to afford to pay their engineers and offer larger bounties instead.

> Is monetary expenditure on vulnerability payouts really the primary determinent of who's taking security more seriously.

Many such researchers would rather sell their 0day to the black market if the effort + price offered is too low and not worth it. It is up to the vendor (Mozilla) to set a fair price to prevent that exploit from reaching the black market for a much higher price.

So given all the above, Mozilla is not serious.