There are several indications that this is a single person “organization”, and not a true research organization. And that’s okay if the research is actually factual and grounded, but the misrepresentation can be a bit off-putting to some, and many of the methodologies seem flawed for the conclusions drawn. There is a distinct lack of actual scientific rigor that seems to be brushed over with language like “state of the art” and “world’s largest” without any evidence those statements are actually true.

I would recommend considering these findings to be moderate to highly unreliable and entirely unverified due to the lack of scientific rigor. Effectively, it is best to consider this as potential political propaganda, which doesn’t indicate any sort of nefariousness, only that it may be motivated by an agenda to prove something rather than independent analysis.