You probably only saw the cursive backup font and not the intended Roboto font that the page actually uses (which took about half a second to load for me); here's a snippet from the CSS:
Not all browsers have a reader mode. And for the record I usually don’t like these design-related comments, but it was literally unreadable. Like some sort of 17th century chicken scratch cursive.
You probably only saw the cursive backup font and not the intended Roboto font that the page actually uses (which took about half a second to load for me); here's a snippet from the CSS:
Site really needs to drop the completely unreadable backup font.
Commenters need to stop complaining and hit the reader mode button on their browsers.
Reader mode isn't an option for me on this page using Firefox mobile.
The better solution is that web devs and designers should either stop changing fonts or learn how to do so without making peoples' eyes bleed.
> Reader mode isn't an option for me on this page using Firefox mobile.
It is for me. Page was great when I opened it in Telegram browser (my default) though, and then I saw the crazy when I opened in Firefox.
Not all browsers have a reader mode. And for the record I usually don’t like these design-related comments, but it was literally unreadable. Like some sort of 17th century chicken scratch cursive.
UA's FTW.