very impressive...
Max+ 395 specced with: 128GB of non-upgradeable LPDDR5x WD_BLACK SN850X NVMe - M.2 2280 - 8TB Noctua fan 3x + 3x extra USB-A & USB-C ports No OS option.
only $2,776.00!!!
very impressive...
Max+ 395 specced with: 128GB of non-upgradeable LPDDR5x WD_BLACK SN850X NVMe - M.2 2280 - 8TB Noctua fan 3x + 3x extra USB-A & USB-C ports No OS option.
only $2,776.00!!!
Bear in mind the gpu has access to all of that 128GB as well, so for AI thats very very cheap.
yeah, slap the Apple brand on this and it's basically the same thing.
People seem to really not understand the limits of wanting unified memory architecture.
Apple CPUs have up to more than 2.5 times the memory bandwidth as this (and you pay for it).
everything's cheap when you're rich
A mac studio configured similarly With 128 GB of memory and an 8 TB SSD is $5799
The Mac Studio (at least the M3 Ultra model) blows the Framework out of the water when it comes to AI performance, though, at least according to this (Dutch language) benchmark: https://tweakers.net/reviews/13614/framework-desktop-de-fram...
Paying twice the price for twice to seven times the performance may not be such a bad thing. Then again, with Apple you're kind of stuck with macOS and the like, so Framework may still be the better option depending on your use case.
The M3 Ultra also consumes a lot more power because Strix Halo is actually a chip for laptops. The Framework here is a desktop but that doesn't change what AMD prioritized when building this chip.
The M3 Ultra is more efficient both on the CPU and GPU side.
I'd hope so since M3 Ultra is using a newer/more efficient manufacturing process than Strix Halo!
One detail is that the memory bandwidth on the M4 Max and M3 Ultra (especially) is considerably higher than the 395+.