> America has a massive overspending problem

What is the right amount of spending? And if the answer is “less than current tax/other revenue” then how should the budget cuts be allocated with goals and implementation plans that are sustained enough to produce real effect? You mention that government spending is not a party-specific issue; and this is certainly true. But I don’t see how forward progress can be made in a winner-take-all environment that shifts polarity every 4-8 years. And when the utilitarian value of compromise and shared long-term goals is treated as nil. And it definitely doesn’t seem to be improving…

In any case, possibly taxing the incomprehensibly wealthy in our midst wouldn’t produce a significant effect relative to other measures; but we do all sorts of things in civic life that are valueless in an economic sense, but serve something else. People stand at attention, remove their caps and lay their right hand on their precordium when the national anthem is played. It symbolizes respect for some (supposedly) shared ideals. Similarly, fairly taxing all citizens symbolizes something ethically important even if it results in just as much economic value as doffing your cap at a ballgame.

Compared to other countries as a % of GDP, US spending is very low for 300M people and very low when it comes to investing in the health and well-being of individuals and absurdly high when it comes to funding death, militarism, and invasive gestapo bureaucracies.

It would save money and misery to have a functional, single-payer healthcare system (not M4A because traditional Medicare isn't complete healthcare and Medicare Advantage is a joke).

Cant agree with you more.

We dont privatize our water supply but we privatize health care.

Very strange.

>What is the right amount of spending?

I am 'dumb money', but my understanding is the 'smart money' thinks the sustainable target deficit is 3% of GDP, and we're currently running at 6%. [0]

[0] https://time.com/7221862/ray-dalio-cut-the-budget-deficit/

If you look at the economics that are connected with a wealthy nation, and not fake wealth (debt), then you wouldn't have to ask the question because both Adam Smith, and Mises cover these things, and more specifically how the promoted approach fails (every time, given sufficient time).

I cant answer your questions as I dont have the 7 trillion dollar federal balance sheets handy.

However I am pointing out that the government inflates our currency which disproportionally hurts the poor and middle class way worse than any billionaire.