All but the last example look better (to me) on Krea than ChatGPT-4.1.
The problem with AI images, in my opinion, is not the generated image (that can be better or worse) but the prompt and instructions given to the AI and their "defaults".
So many blog posts and social media updates have that horrible (again, to me) feel and look of overly plastic vibe, like a cartoon that has been burn... just like "needs more JPEG" but "needs more AI-vibe".
I'd argue the last one looks better as well, at least if you're considering what looks more 'real'. The ChatGPT one looks like it could have been a shot from a film, the Krea one looks like a photo someone took off their phone of a person heading into a car park on their way back from a party dressed as a super hero (which I think far better fits the vibe of the original image).
My problem with the last one is that the person is not walking directly into the door hence giving an unrealistic vibe that the ChatGPT one does not have.
Sure, it looks like he's walking toward the control panel on the right of the door.
Personally - I think it looks considerably better than the GPT image.
Yeah I see that a lot. Blog usage of AI pics seem to fall into two camps:
1. The image just seems to be completely unrelated to the actual content of the article
2. The image looks like it came out of SD 1.5 with smeared text, blur, etc.