I do understand that. I was just illustrating that it's possible to do very holistically integrated desktops programmatically and in a way where you can do some math once and leverage it again.
I'm personally a fan of `ono-sendai-blue`, but I have a friend in a defense adjacent space and I gather `ono-sendai-tactical` is enjoyed there. The blacks in these reference palettes are a reasonable starting point for many displays, you'll want to hint for your specific one to get optimal outcomes.
https://gist.github.com/b7r6/581295d8bb905ef598a05fdf2810a07...
https://gist.github.com/b7r6/fbbfb1cf2a3d14927bbe621a9050522...
Thank you for clarifying. I opened that screenshot prepared to be amazed by blackness... My mistake ;)
Haha, no worries friend. I find it's just totally counter-intuitive how much difference a little configuration makes relative to the cost of the monitor. Even a relatively inexpensive monitor (I've got like a 200 dollar gaming one that's like an Acer Predator clone and it just looked awful but tuned up it looks great, not as good as my real LG panel but still really good). I never really thought of monitors as something that need a bunch of tuning, but it really makes your dollar go further to get the black balance and subpixel hinting and stuff dialed in. For someone like me who can't afford to just go buy an Apple XDR on a whim, it's worth it.