Moreover... Most young people are indoctrinated extensively in the female-centric view of society deemed acceptable by polite society. When following that program causes them a great deal of misery with the opposite sex, it is natural for them to feel betrayed and to seek a viewpoint from outside. The fact that the mainstream hates Andrew Tate has the perverse effect of making him more credible to the victims of mainstream brainwashing, regardless of the fact that he pushes a bunch of cringe stuff along with some reasonable takes. I think most people who like Tate probably recognize that it's a mixed bag. But they will put up with the nonsense just to hear some kind of pep talk that meshes with their life experiences.

> Most young people are indoctrinated extensively in the female-centric view of society deemed acceptable by polite society.

Which is what exactly?

To be frank, I wouldn't like to be an American young man nowadays, nor would I like to be an American young woman.

Everytime this kind of debate pops up on the internet, you seem to see two very vocal camps, one pushing the most absurd reactionary non sense about what men should be openly exposing the grossest misoginy I have ever had the displeasure to read and the other one barely containing its deep seated misandry. People really like to reduce this topic to a for them or against them position preferably erasing any kind of complexity in the process.

I feel like normal people have exited the discussion on this topic a long time ago and the young who live most of their social life on the internet nowadays are just exposed to what remains.

[deleted]

You mention America but this is an international cultural issue. The US is not even the worst country as far as gender relations goes.

>People really like to reduce this topic to a for them or against them position preferably erasing any kind of complexity in the process.

I think you want to shrug this off as some kind of "both sides" situation while ignoring the simple and irrefutable facts on the ground.

>I feel like normal people have exited the discussion on this topic a long time ago and the young who live most of their social life on the internet nowadays are just exposed to what remains.

Do you know many young or old people who are unaware of what goes online these days? Is misandry coming out of your TV, popular books, or magazines more acceptable than misogyny on some website or video online? I have met countless women poisoned against me personally without even knowing me. If you try to talk about men's issues, most women just don't want to hear it. They've been taught for decades that men are keeping them down, they deserve everything they want, etc.

> You mention America but this is an international cultural issue. The US is not even the worst country as far as gender relations goes.

No, it's not.

Thankfully, my country has been sparred pretty much all the discussion about transgender and bathroom and most of the religious reactionary non sense. It's very much a problem of the USA and by extension countries which consume media in English like the UK.

> I think you want to shrug this off as some kind of "both sides" situation while ignoring the simple and irrefutable facts on the ground.

Which are? You are turning the discussion into a for or against irrefutable facts by the way. Thank you for nicely illustrating my point.

>No, it's not.

South Korea, Japan, and even Russia would like to have a word with you.

>Thankfully, my country has been sparred pretty much all the discussion about transgender and bathroom and most of the religious reactionary non sense. It's very much a problem of the USA and by extension countries which consume media in English like the UK.

The bathroom and pronoun stuff is definitely originating in the anglosphere. But this is being pushed out to all corners of the world. If you managed to avoid it, be thankful and continue to live in your bubble and don't lecture me about it. By the way, resistance to this garbage is not "religious" in general. Even atheists hate the propaganda and woke moralizing.

>Which are? You are turning the discussion into a for or against irrefutable facts by the way. Thank you for nicely illustrating my point.

I don't have time to write a dissertation on this topic. But the facts I refer to are the ones that everyone has to deal with in their daily lives. You can try to tell me it's this way or that way but you're a foreigner telling me my experience of decades is actually just the imagination of a terminally online weirdo. Tell it to someone less committed to trusting their eyes and ears.

> South Korea, Japan, and even Russia would like to have a word with you.

If you think anything happening in Russia is somehow linked to the discussion in the USA, I can’t do anything for you.

> By the way, resistance to this garbage is not "religious" in general.

Who said anything about resistance? I’m just listing two nauseous things the US currently exports.