In my experience you can get around it by having a linter rule disallowing it and using a local claude file instructing it to fix the linting issues every time it does something.
In my experience you can get around it by having a linter rule disallowing it and using a local claude file instructing it to fix the linting issues every time it does something.
You can equally get around a significant portion of the purported issues with dynamically typed languages by having Claude run tests, and try to run the actual code.
I have no problem believing they will handle some languages better than others, but I don't think we'll know whether typing makes a significant difference vs. other factors without actual tests.
I always instructions to have the LLM run `task build` before claiming a task is done.
Build runs linters and tests and actually builds the project, kinda-sorta confirming that nothing major broke.
it does not always work in my experience due to complex type definitions. Also extra tool calls and time are needed to fix linting.