I saw the title, got ready to post about my own criminal monkey misadventures, and realized it's the same place (Uluwatu Temple). However, the story underplays an important element: it's actually a triangular syndicate of crime, and humans are very much part of the picture.
First, the monkey steals something of value from a tourist and (the missing bit) they run inside the temple buildings, which are off-limits to tourists.
Second, a friendly temple priest or caretaker (the mentioned "monkey handlers"), who is allowed inside, fences the loot by exchanging it for something a monkey values, like a tasty banana.
Third, the relieved tourist gets their belongings back and generously tips the caretaker.
Do you think WSJ is doing this deliberately? Leaving out the part about how it's actually humans behind it. I've heard of this a long time ago, but I see this is a new story. Probably a hundred generations of monkeys have learned this behavior and they don't need any training or handling at this point!
It would not surprise me if WSJ leave this out to avoid painting white tourists as victims.
Or brown locals as complicit.
Ah yes, the infamously woke Wall Street Journal, bastion of leftwing propaganda since time immemorial.
Yup, that seems to pretty much sum up Trump's view of it.
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-wsj-2673800159/