Saying something is a “thing of the past” is the same as saying that something is archaic and should go away. It’s not a declaration of fact.
Saying something is a “thing of the past” is the same as saying that something is archaic and should go away. It’s not a declaration of fact.
Not distinguishing between "is" and "should be" explains a lot about why programmer types have trouble with requirements. :D
We should be held to higher standards with our discourse than this.