>spends entire article cherry picking evidence in an attempt to discredit one article specifically to advance a competing narrative.
Worse than that. He's lying about what the article claims. Straw-man is too generous of a term, he's blatantly just making shit up.
Do you have an example?
Yeah. I wrote a pretty lengthy comment on it in this very thread. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44751520
You could also just read the sourced article and it's pretty flipping obvious.
It's absurdly blatant.