>Not surprising at all to hear that Matt Stoller got the economics of an antitrust issue wrong.
I mean he didn't. The article is legitimately straw-manning. All of his claims are not present in the source article.
It's a disgusting, sleazy piece of journalism.
So no, you didn't hear he got it wrong. You were lied to by the author.
I have a PhD in economics with a specialization in antitrust policy.
Fact:
“Matt stoller gets big, important issues wrong in antitrust all the time and his analysis shouldn’t be taken seriously.”
Source: me
You are welcome to cite that.
But he doesn't get them wrong. Your opinion on this is like a doctor saying the COVID vaccines don't work.
Sure you _might_ be a doctor, but your position is objectively deficient on this topic.
ALSO WEIRDLY, it's noticeable you didn't have anything to say about the fact that he's strawmanning.
You don't need a hyper focus in any field to see that's exactly what the author did. Or the fact that you don't seem to care about it.
Want to explain that one buddy?