Mario in particular no, because Nintendo is actually pretty good about keeping away from that stuff. Let's say... Palworld? Perhaps so, given that it can be purchased on stores that also feature pornographic titles.
And set up family-managed accounts this way as well, to be clear.
One of the things I've learned as an adult is that moral busybodies like this are, on average, horrible parents who would rather tell the powers-thay-be how the government should raise their kid (and everyone else's), than raise their kid themselves.
Because, ultimately, this whole reaction and performance isn't about the kid. It's about the parent.
Exactly, all these groups of parents with their sensitivities offended constantly, are the ones refusing to actually take charge and responsibility for what their children do.
It's parents that don't want to put in the effort to actually monitor what their kid is doing they want to hand a kid an ipad and let the ipad only let them see things they feel are good, but not actually have to monitor what the kid is doing because government ipad content is babysitting/raising their kid for them.
That's good and it's especially good when accounts have parental access controls which include a setting to disallow certain child account settings from being changed. The benefit of doing that is to help people avoid seeing the pornographic titles altogether, which actually supports the thesis that a non-pornographic game can be an entry for someone to start playing pornographic games. Otherwise, what's the point of the setting?
Mario in particular no, because Nintendo is actually pretty good about keeping away from that stuff. Let's say... Palworld? Perhaps so, given that it can be purchased on stores that also feature pornographic titles.
You can literally toggle a switch and never see any pornographic title
And set up family-managed accounts this way as well, to be clear.
One of the things I've learned as an adult is that moral busybodies like this are, on average, horrible parents who would rather tell the powers-thay-be how the government should raise their kid (and everyone else's), than raise their kid themselves.
Because, ultimately, this whole reaction and performance isn't about the kid. It's about the parent.
Exactly, all these groups of parents with their sensitivities offended constantly, are the ones refusing to actually take charge and responsibility for what their children do.
It's parents that don't want to put in the effort to actually monitor what their kid is doing they want to hand a kid an ipad and let the ipad only let them see things they feel are good, but not actually have to monitor what the kid is doing because government ipad content is babysitting/raising their kid for them.
That's good and it's especially good when accounts have parental access controls which include a setting to disallow certain child account settings from being changed. The benefit of doing that is to help people avoid seeing the pornographic titles altogether, which actually supports the thesis that a non-pornographic game can be an entry for someone to start playing pornographic games. Otherwise, what's the point of the setting?
Early Newgrounds would like to disagree...