> I believed him 100% about EPO but the motor stuff is silly. they check for motors for over a decade now.
If it's silly then why are they trying to counter it for over a decade?
> I believed him 100% about EPO but the motor stuff is silly. they check for motors for over a decade now.
If it's silly then why are they trying to counter it for over a decade?
Because where there are no checks there are the cheaters.
Example: there is no antidoping in amateur races. Amateurs dope themselves to win those races.
> Because where there are no checks there are the cheaters.
Were there any instances where people cheated in spite of testing, and were undetected for years?
[dead]
[dead]