> They have literally nothing new, not even in theory
They haven’t built anything yet. It’s a bit premature to call out the non-existing product as insufficiently novel.
> They have literally nothing new, not even in theory
They haven’t built anything yet. It’s a bit premature to call out the non-existing product as insufficiently novel.
>It’s a bit premature to call out the non-existing product as insufficiently novel.
I think the point is that the pie-in-the-sky promises are insufficiently novel.
> point is that the pie-in-the-sky promises are insufficiently novel
You have no data to judge novelty on. If you think AI rocket science, they’re flubs. If you don’t, they have a shot. Either way, I can’t see novelty being unsatisfied.