Who are these people who use the commercial Oracle Java version and why do they need it? When running on AWS you are probably better off running Amazon's Java, on Azure you are probably better off running Microsoft's Java, on RedHat you probably run Redhats Java, etc.
I'm working for a european org that is close to government and has been granted immortality by law, so market forces only apply in a very dampened capacity. They pay a premium for Commercial Java to be able to ask for certain features or support. ...Oracle always declines them with a variety of excuses, so there's no upside. Their older developers say they use features specific to the Oracle version, but I've never seen that, it works fine with OpenJDK, Jetbrain's, Amazon's or Microsoft's JDK
I used to work for such org, I'm 99.42% sure they don't use those features.
That situation arise when the person responsible for approving contracts doesn't understant jack and takes the most expensive one so that if any problem arise, it's not their fault.
The EU is where I found the strongest "Nobody Gets Fired For Buying IBM" mindset.
And Oracle, Microsoft, SAP and the others know it.
The older devs have zero upsides if they use a different JDK, but plenty of downsides if it introduces any issues. Is it really surprising then that they want to maintain the status quo?
It should never matter, unless you have something specific you need from one of the various proprietary JVM's. The free JVM's are usually vanilla pre-compiled OpenJDK.
Frankly, imho, you should be deploying within a container even for simple/basic apps these days - so you bring your own JVM and environment rather than use something the platform provides.
The folks paying for Oracle JDK are likely big corps that want to pass the support-buck when it's 3am and something went down...
I used to work for Enterprise running Java 3rd party applications. Some of them had a requirement that we would only use Oracle Java if we wanted support.
Companies were starting to pick up on the fact that people were getting pretty angry with that arrangement and were offering to support OpenJDK or other Java, if we would upgrade to latest and greatest.
We switched completely to AWS Corretto and told our IT department to remove all Oracle/Sun Java and ban the downloads. Then promptly ignored the Oracle emails.
It was the same thing for us with Qt Commercial licensing. We use only the LGPL version, dynamically link, don't modify the source, and give credit, so we're fully in compliance. To get support we chose to purchase commercial licenses for our small team of developers. Cue a regular series of calls about whether we were sure we were in compliance, etc. To add insult to injury they couldn't even navigate our purchasing process so it was a pain to pay them.
I'll take my chances in the open source world. It's a shame that the companies that created the software aren't getting paid, truly. But don't make it so obnoxious to reward you.
A support contract from Oracle to help you if things go wrong. Probably not worth it for the vast majority of users, but a small group is paying Oracle for this.
Call this unpopular opinion (probably gonna get downvoted anyway), but the amount Oracle gets paid because lazy-devs are well, too lazy to read which JVM arguments should they put to their deployment, requiring hand-holding by the Oracle-support team.
I understand in the olden times there were javax.* and JavaEE, but nowadays, especially in the newer JDKs, these are completely gone. Whoever maintains Java 1.6 in their core infrastructure already doomed, regardless of Oracle asking them $$$ or not.
edit: I know various Java-devs which are "runs on my machine" mindset. As a DevOps engineer, most of the production outages I took care of were avoidable by removing this mindset and actually testing the code in a sandbox environment...
I've had an ongoing debate with a guy who is supposedly senior java dev of 20+ years that doesn't understand the most basic aspects of concurrency, and codes "worked on my local" style and engages in obnoxious blame games with DevOps and infra teams about how his application works totally fine spinning up 10,000 threads on his 16 core macbook, but for "some reason" craps out in production running on a 1 vcpu allocated container. At least a year of back and forth on this and he doesn't understand why. Wish I was making it up.
It's always disappointing to me to come across some really interesting innovative new tool, like a programming language, and then find it was built on JVM.
I get it. It's all about the size of the ecosystem and the garbage collector.
Yes, there are great open source implementations. But not even Google could pull off a clean-room reimplementation without encountering unthinkable legal expense.
I'm reminded again of the meme of the Oracle org chart
https://palisadecompliance.com//wp-content/uploads/2013/11/o...
Mighty bold of them to assume that most of engineering would be above most of legal.
Who are these people who use the commercial Oracle Java version and why do they need it? When running on AWS you are probably better off running Amazon's Java, on Azure you are probably better off running Microsoft's Java, on RedHat you probably run Redhats Java, etc.
I'm working for a european org that is close to government and has been granted immortality by law, so market forces only apply in a very dampened capacity. They pay a premium for Commercial Java to be able to ask for certain features or support. ...Oracle always declines them with a variety of excuses, so there's no upside. Their older developers say they use features specific to the Oracle version, but I've never seen that, it works fine with OpenJDK, Jetbrain's, Amazon's or Microsoft's JDK
I used to work for such org, I'm 99.42% sure they don't use those features.
That situation arise when the person responsible for approving contracts doesn't understant jack and takes the most expensive one so that if any problem arise, it's not their fault.
The EU is where I found the strongest "Nobody Gets Fired For Buying IBM" mindset.
And Oracle, Microsoft, SAP and the others know it.
Sounds like the older developers have some form of Stockholm Syndrome.
The older devs have zero upsides if they use a different JDK, but plenty of downsides if it introduces any issues. Is it really surprising then that they want to maintain the status quo?
It should never matter, unless you have something specific you need from one of the various proprietary JVM's. The free JVM's are usually vanilla pre-compiled OpenJDK.
Frankly, imho, you should be deploying within a container even for simple/basic apps these days - so you bring your own JVM and environment rather than use something the platform provides.
The folks paying for Oracle JDK are likely big corps that want to pass the support-buck when it's 3am and something went down...
I used to work for Enterprise running Java 3rd party applications. Some of them had a requirement that we would only use Oracle Java if we wanted support.
Companies were starting to pick up on the fact that people were getting pretty angry with that arrangement and were offering to support OpenJDK or other Java, if we would upgrade to latest and greatest.
We switched completely to AWS Corretto and told our IT department to remove all Oracle/Sun Java and ban the downloads. Then promptly ignored the Oracle emails.
Haven't heard from them since.
It was the same thing for us with Qt Commercial licensing. We use only the LGPL version, dynamically link, don't modify the source, and give credit, so we're fully in compliance. To get support we chose to purchase commercial licenses for our small team of developers. Cue a regular series of calls about whether we were sure we were in compliance, etc. To add insult to injury they couldn't even navigate our purchasing process so it was a pain to pay them.
I'll take my chances in the open source world. It's a shame that the companies that created the software aren't getting paid, truly. But don't make it so obnoxious to reward you.
The best thing a company can ever do is block downloads.oracle.com at the firewall.
Seems quite onerous. There is even a market for advisors specialized in serving "companies and governments looking for help with Oracle".
https://palisadecompliance.com/about/
What's the advantage of using Oracle's Java instead of the OSS version?
A support contract from Oracle to help you if things go wrong. Probably not worth it for the vast majority of users, but a small group is paying Oracle for this.
Call this unpopular opinion (probably gonna get downvoted anyway), but the amount Oracle gets paid because lazy-devs are well, too lazy to read which JVM arguments should they put to their deployment, requiring hand-holding by the Oracle-support team.
I understand in the olden times there were javax.* and JavaEE, but nowadays, especially in the newer JDKs, these are completely gone. Whoever maintains Java 1.6 in their core infrastructure already doomed, regardless of Oracle asking them $$$ or not.
edit: I know various Java-devs which are "runs on my machine" mindset. As a DevOps engineer, most of the production outages I took care of were avoidable by removing this mindset and actually testing the code in a sandbox environment...
I've had an ongoing debate with a guy who is supposedly senior java dev of 20+ years that doesn't understand the most basic aspects of concurrency, and codes "worked on my local" style and engages in obnoxious blame games with DevOps and infra teams about how his application works totally fine spinning up 10,000 threads on his 16 core macbook, but for "some reason" craps out in production running on a 1 vcpu allocated container. At least a year of back and forth on this and he doesn't understand why. Wish I was making it up.
Oracle spoiled the sport of arguing about Java -vs- other programming languages. Now all you have to say to win that argument is "lawnmower".
Gotta keep Larry Ellison rich!
[dead]
It's always disappointing to me to come across some really interesting innovative new tool, like a programming language, and then find it was built on JVM.
I get it. It's all about the size of the ecosystem and the garbage collector.
Yes, there are great open source implementations. But not even Google could pull off a clean-room reimplementation without encountering unthinkable legal expense.