The effects of deliberate small scale atmospheric aerosol injections is something I've studied extensively. The short term results are often quite noticeable even by parties not directly participating in the study.
The effects of deliberate small scale atmospheric aerosol injections is something I've studied extensively. The short term results are often quite noticeable even by parties not directly participating in the study.
This is why I think it will not be done. Any possible blow back will be attributed to those who actioned it, even if it might not be their fault. Do some injection in one part of the world and breadbasket crop fails 6 months later, they can point the finger even if it would have happened regardless.
To risky in terms of liability.
I don't think one will be able to prove that you affected anything directly, so quite the opposite, there's no liability.
Otherwise I'm gonna hold the international maritime organisation solely responsible for every drought, fire and megastorm from how much their ban of fuel with sulphur content has exacerbated the warming situation by destabilizing the existing balance.