De facto, not de jure. SFPD went AWOL for a few months. One can’t complain about that and then claim it would be better if they were fired.
(Also, your own chart shows a ‘20 dip.)
De facto, not de jure. SFPD went AWOL for a few months. One can’t complain about that and then claim it would be better if they were fired.
(Also, your own chart shows a ‘20 dip.)
“De facto abolition of policing” or “dip”? Pick one!
Cops throwing a tantrum over a dip would seem to prove a point, too.
But cops throwing a tantrum causing a crime spike proves their worth.
You can’t advocate for abolishing cops and also complain about cops self abolishing.