If you don’t think this system should be used, it should never have been built in the first place. Relying on a state law to prevent sharing data sounds rather naive.
Second, the page barely mentions ice, title is begging for clicks.
> “We take privacy seriously…
A gun has a trigger. It is a system intended to be used.
You cannot legally use it to rob a bank, though. Specific uses of that system are forbidden.
An ICBM has a trigger, too.
But you can't buy one at Wal Mart, and be trusted to only pull that trigger in situations when the uses of that system are legal! We don't sell them to consumers because the anticipated and obvious outcomes are harmful.
Flock Safety generated a treasure trove of highly sensitive data. In theory, there's nothing wrong with collecting that data, or even using it to investigate specific crimes with searches of limited scope under a judicial warrant. It's only harmful when used inappropriately... but no one should be surprised when that happened.
Law enforcement types don’t think of doing their job as equivalent to “robbing a bank,” so the thought process you are relying on can’t work.
The article mentions ICE usage, including a link to an entire article about it. Nothing wrong with the title mentioning it.
It mentions many usages, but only one made it to the title.