I personally do not use LLMs (knowingly) at all, largely for environmental reasons. The improvements are, to me, not worth the attrocious energy use. I will happily pay 20% or whatever more in both money and time.
I also have no interest in technology that impedes my skill development. I do not want to use anything that makes me a worse writer over time.
YMMV, I am answering the OP not evangelizing. Counter arguments will be ignored.
You don't owe anyone a back and forth discussion anyway, so the last line comes off as redundant.
You are, of course, right. But my experience with comments in response to environmental impacts of LLMs here has been so negative that it feels appropriate nonetheless.
> YMMV, I am answering the OP not evangelizing. Counter arguments will be ignored.
Reminds me of the Monty Python Arguing sketch.
No it doesn't