> Please bring some arguments that can be backed by facts or studies that can be peer reviewed and examined by critical thinking, not by emotional appeals to "Nazis are bad m'kay".

You mean, like, the vast body of literature, the many museums, the crates of pictures and photos, the miles of movie rolls documenting and discussing Nazi atrocities, ideology, philosophy, science, policies and system of governance?

> Let's look at the results: For all its faults, the US's boundaryless freedom of speech assured by its constitution made it the longest running democracy to date, meanwhile your country has been juggling between monarchies, dictators and government policed nanny states all its existence, but has the audacity to think it knows what true freedom of speech is like when it never had it to begin with.

That's just alluding to American Exceptionalism. Germany did that, too, a lot actually. "Deutscher Sonderweg" was the key phrase. Anyhow, Nazi Germany is 80 years ago now and quite well researched, Socialist East Germany is 36 years ago now and also quite well researched, and all Germany has to show for it is the idea that if you like your liberty and justice for all you have to draw a line when somebody says "no, not for you, only for us."

Granted, it is not much, but it is something. If you look at it empirically, Germany has falsified a few approaches, while the USA is running on a hypothesis resembling the Weimar Republic in many ways, but certainly not all. EUropean's can't help it if they remember that shit better than USians, they were closer by for the last century or so.