It's something most piano teachers advise AGAINST. But I am of the opinion that anything that makes you play the instrument works.
It's something most piano teachers advise AGAINST. But I am of the opinion that anything that makes you play the instrument works.
The problem is it's hard to unlearn bad technique. If you play scales wrong you can get stuck progressing and have to start over while suppressing the urge to just play like you always did.
You're right for "serious" learning. But for most people, the alternative is not learning anything at all! The best technique is the one that'll actually make you play the piano
Bad technique on unserious learning can still lead to serious injuries like RSI.
Proper technique is also important so that playing is actually fun and not painful. Even just a few lessons on how to properly sit, how to avoid tension in your hands and so on can go a long way. There are video lessons that explain that stuff as well but you need to be very disciplined and really repeat these lessons over and over.
You can absolutely self-learn the piano. People that genuinely don't have the money for a teacher shouldn't let that stop them but it absolutely is harder. Set yourself up for success if you can.
There is no such thing as serious/non-serious learning.
I take weekly music lessons and have been doing that for a decade. After every lesson -- since the very first one -- I am amazed by how many simple things that I get wrong, and how many different areas where I could improve. The teacher just sees/hears that immediately, when you have no idea what you did wrong. And the music just sounds different.
Not only that, the teacher discusses the piece with you, tells you the efficient way to practice (a specific piece or specific passage) etc.
You would probably sound ok to a random stranger, but you quickly hit a bottleneck. You spend a lot of time doing incorrect/inefficient things without knowing it.
$100/hr is expensive, but well worth it.
I think learning how to unlearn is part of it. You'll often encounter music that is fingered unintuitively when learning increasingly difficult pieces. Plus if you're able to play legato at 100% speed guitar hero style you've probably discovered a mostly correct fingering anyway.
For good reason. Learning fluency reading sheet music is critical. Rocksmith is great, with caveats, but the fact that they, by default, invert the strings compared to tablature conventions on guitar should be proof enough that they are pedagogically terrible without some guidance.
The other problem is that their learning technique, in which you start with fewer notes and add in all the notes over time, is not good at ALL. It masks certain things from you and even makes some things harder at lower difficulties when it's playing some scale and you don't know that so you're just playing random notes in it. Knowing that it was just a pentatonic scale or something would make it much simpler. Instead, you're taught to just play isolated notes instead of learning how to understand what that scale was, how to play it, and how to apply that to other songs. It's almost outright hostile towards a big picture music theory based approach on teaching how to play and instead focuses on memorizing the specific notes for each section of each song.
Anyway, piano scales and chords are not challenging to learn compared to most piano technique. If you don't have a teacher then buy Hanon, get a decent music theory book, and look up Youtube videos. Any of these training wheels based learning approaches seem to just assume that once you do it enough you'll pick up the theory. No. If you can't afford lessons (which I stress are very important) then you should at least make use of simple music theory books and videos on Youtube.
Yes - the usual comment with these things is that you're not learning notes, you're learning movements.
Scales have specific fingerings and hand movements, including thumb over/under movements at specific locations.
They're not optional extras. They're essential for fluid playing.
More subtly there's also basic finger/hand positioning, which has to be a difficult combination of as-relaxed-as-possible but also firm and precise, so you get fine control over dynamics and timing.
If you don't learn the vocabulary of physical movements, you won't have the physical foundation you need to play notated music properly beyond the very basics.
Upvoted. As a beginner guitarist, I find that Rocksmith’s approach doesn’t work well for learning songs. I prefer to turn up the difficulty to 100% and turn the tempo down to something I can play comfortably and then gradually increase the tempo. This has the drawback that the song sounds very different when played at 25%. It’d be nicer if they were more judicious in their choice of notes to play for their lower difficulty levels.
At the moment, I’m focussing on working on my timing by playing rhythm instead of lead guitar.
That's 100% the right way to do it and how traditional learning works (you just use a metronome and slowly work up to full tempo)
If you haven't already, please PLEASE choose the "invert" option for the string order. Your low pitched E string (the red one) should be on the bottom of the strings. It will mean that all your work will transfer immediately to both guitar tabs as well as conventional chord charts. The fact that Rocksmith is teaching people to train their muscle memory on upside down chord charts is so insane to me.
Honestly reddit is so fucking tiring. If you don't have a piano teacher 3x a week you'll never learn? Huh? Most famous pop piano players learned by themselves just noodling, and they have bad technique, but they still amaze. Same with guitar. Anyone who's super good at an instrument is going to get there however.
You'd be surprised how many famous pop piano players didn't just have lessons, they had advanced training.
Elton John studied at the Royal Academy of Music. Alicia Keys is classically trained. Lady Gaga had lessons from the age of 4.
Even someone like Vangelis - nominally self-taught, and not a reader or writer - had lessons when he was starting out.
There are many many examples on both sides. That you can cite many who have had a lot of classical training doesn't disprove the point that many others have had minimal training.
Right, I'd argue that the people without training are going to be way more surprising.
First of all: they noodled by themselves, i.e. they gained their own intimacy with the instrument, which is something you cannot teach but only explore on your own. Secondly, you don't know if they didn't have any teachers or mentors or players they asked questions to or learned from. "self made" is not really a thing
I want to know which professional learned piano as a first instrument with just noodling. Maybe a handful of geniuses, but nothing more.
Most people get lessons so saying it is a handful is likely right. However I know a few who play for fun that never had lessons, and they sound good.
Honestly, no, you won't. It's very difficult and requires training. Those famous players made music their entire lifes work. Thinking that means you can just teach yourself at 35 with no musical training is idiotic.