I genuinely find that interesting to hear. what about the 30 examples felt different to say the frontpage? (assuming it did)

On a meta level i was suuuuper conscious of writing every word of this post/comments myself, as my prior is that HN's community is very intollerant of and highly sensitive to low effort content, whether via AI or not. This is despite using AI tools for lots of other parts of work (drafting, coding, summarising, brainstorming etc).

Do you think HN has become more accepting of AI slop, the slop is becoming harder to detect, or isnt as discerning as i assume?