Then go join a thread where someone is actually talking about that issue, which is very valid, and make a meaningful contribution to the conversation. Jumping on people for no reason other than they have touched a language model is just rude.
No you go. It is allowed to diss a thing in the thread about that thing if we think that thing is bad. People here dissed Dropbox when it was launched... and this is no Dropbox.
There are things that are not allowed. But here someone made a good point without any personal attacks. You silencing people is probably the least appropriate thing in this thread.
> make a meaningful contribution
What was not a meaningful contribution, mentioning the relevant schema? Saying using the LLM is bad for example because it is trained on our content without permission and payment? or that this steals from people who provide you content for free and make money from ads?
Then go join a thread where someone is actually talking about that issue, which is very valid, and make a meaningful contribution to the conversation. Jumping on people for no reason other than they have touched a language model is just rude.
No you go. It is allowed to diss a thing in the thread about that thing if we think that thing is bad. People here dissed Dropbox when it was launched... and this is no Dropbox.
There are things that are not allowed. But here someone made a good point without any personal attacks. You silencing people is probably the least appropriate thing in this thread.
> make a meaningful contribution
What was not a meaningful contribution, mentioning the relevant schema? Saying using the LLM is bad for example because it is trained on our content without permission and payment? or that this steals from people who provide you content for free and make money from ads?
I'm not interested in continuing this conversation.
I wish you didn't start it... I see it's you who posted the top level comment but it doesn't mean you "own" the thread.