What's wrong with that? Most likely, the discussion coming from various people has more value than any single article, unless it's something truly phenomenal.
What's wrong with that? Most likely, the discussion coming from various people has more value than any single article, unless it's something truly phenomenal.
I never said it was wrong, nor right. In fact, you might even read that as an excuse for "counter-hypists", as it's a pretty bad look to upvote such a low-quality submission. And I've made my own fun of AGI hype, but with knowledge of the fact that brevity is the fool of wit.