Thats like calling a cupboard a fridge cuz you can keep food in it. The paper clearly sets out to try and prove that the ideal definition of AGI is practically impossible.
Thats like calling a cupboard a fridge cuz you can keep food in it. The paper clearly sets out to try and prove that the ideal definition of AGI is practically impossible.
We already have much easier proofs that no system is perfect. So if it's only trying to disprove perfect AGI, it's both clickbait and redundant.