Congratulations on having been born into an environment where you’ve had the privilege of becoming so fluent in English that you feel comfortable complaining about other people’s stylistic choices in writing.
Note: This comment was translated using an LLM.
> you feel comfortable complaining about other people’s stylistic choices in writing
Yeah, why be such a privileged prick that you belittle someone's diction? Everyone should be free to write how they want to. In fact: if you complain about grammar you're just as fucking classist, you reactionary scum. Hell, there's no real difference between unintelligible grunting and pointing and properly written sentences in a tone appropriate for the context.
The point being made is that fluency in English is usually due to birth and lack of fluency isn’t an indicator of stupidity
To be simplistic, fluency in English is not an indicator of greater intelligence than someone born to non English speaking parents
I have grown to absolutely despise the LLM "voice".
Gemini Pro switching from showing full "reasoning" output to mind-grating cutesy LLM titles and summaries was the last straw.
For non-native speakers, however, LLM-based translation and proofreading is a real godsend. Hong is Korean so that might be the reason why.
That article looks like it was originally written in English and then translated into Korean.
Congratulations on having been born into an environment where you’ve had the privilege of becoming so fluent in English that you feel comfortable complaining about other people’s stylistic choices in writing. Note: This comment was translated using an LLM.
> you feel comfortable complaining about other people’s stylistic choices in writing
Yeah, why be such a privileged prick that you belittle someone's diction? Everyone should be free to write how they want to. In fact: if you complain about grammar you're just as fucking classist, you reactionary scum. Hell, there's no real difference between unintelligible grunting and pointing and properly written sentences in a tone appropriate for the context.
The point being made is that fluency in English is usually due to birth and lack of fluency isn’t an indicator of stupidity To be simplistic, fluency in English is not an indicator of greater intelligence than someone born to non English speaking parents
Hope it helps
It does not because no one said or even implied anything like that.
Congratulations on becoming so fluent in English (tool assisted or not) to start gatekeeping and shaming other people's tastes and opinions!