> Yes it does. You can have a trial for your traffic ticket.
A trial was not required for the city to issue you a ticket. You can contest the ticket in traffic court where you will _not_ get a jury of your peers.
Everything the government does can eventually be contested in court (with a judge). Even if Liu makes an appeal and it gets denied he can still turn to the courts.
> That's just false. In fact, courts overrule laws and the procedures they authorize because they lack due process.
This is a non-sequitur statement.
Courts overruling some laws and some procedures does not change the definition of "due process".
No court has overruled this law and no court has overruled cops being allowed arrest people without consulting a judge first.
> A trial was not required for the city to issue you a ticket.
A trial is not required for the police to arrest you for murder, which you can contest in court or not.
> Courts overruling some laws and some procedures does not change the definition of "due process".
It does when they overrule them for omitting due process, as I said.