Why do anything? Better to just sit on the couch.
There are plenty of things worthy of doing, spaces left to explore and discoveries to be made.
Destroying a natural wonder in the name of impressing your buddies doesn't fall under that.
Accessibility of these things drives further interest in preservation.
The US national parks are a great example of how that works.
I'm sure you are the arbiter of whats worth doing.
Sure. Here's my full criteria: Is it a net positive for the world at large? It's worth doing.
That's it. Go out unto the world and do with that as you will
Wouldn't the most beneficial thing then just be to kill myself? Overpopulation and such
Going skydiving, auto racing, sailing, working out... All pointless if I'm understanding this logic.
>Is it a net positive for the world at large?
The idea that such a subjective criteria should be used is more offensive than the hubris.
There are plenty of things worthy of doing, spaces left to explore and discoveries to be made.
Destroying a natural wonder in the name of impressing your buddies doesn't fall under that.
Accessibility of these things drives further interest in preservation.
The US national parks are a great example of how that works.
I'm sure you are the arbiter of whats worth doing.
Sure. Here's my full criteria: Is it a net positive for the world at large? It's worth doing.
That's it. Go out unto the world and do with that as you will
Wouldn't the most beneficial thing then just be to kill myself? Overpopulation and such
Going skydiving, auto racing, sailing, working out... All pointless if I'm understanding this logic.
>Is it a net positive for the world at large?
The idea that such a subjective criteria should be used is more offensive than the hubris.