His mistake was in couching it language of Internet adoption rather than the gross impact on economic productivity. He was wrong on the former and mostly right on the latter. It is very possible for a technology to have dramatic effect on society without a big impact on overall economic productivity
Darren acegmolu is making only the latter argument. I’m betting he’s right.
Well then I don't care what "productivity" means I guess.
Everyone glued to their smart phones, AI making decisions on tarrif policy. ML algorithms dictating who stays in the country and who is dissappeared...
But it all amounts to nothing worth worrying about because "productivity".
His mistake was in couching it language of Internet adoption rather than the gross impact on economic productivity. He was wrong on the former and mostly right on the latter. It is very possible for a technology to have dramatic effect on society without a big impact on overall economic productivity
Darren acegmolu is making only the latter argument. I’m betting he’s right.
Well then I don't care what "productivity" means I guess.
Everyone glued to their smart phones, AI making decisions on tarrif policy. ML algorithms dictating who stays in the country and who is dissappeared...
But it all amounts to nothing worth worrying about because "productivity".
Fortunately Kruman is not one of them.