Now developers have to give their source code for free and can also not monetize subscription. Is it some kind of modern slavery?
Now developers have to give their source code for free and can also not monetize subscription. Is it some kind of modern slavery?
The only place I'm insistent about source-code is things like this that need access to a ton of my data at all times. An app that only has access to the data I choose to share with it, I'm more willing to give-and-take on the show-me-the-code front.
As far as subscriptions go, a lot of devs have moved to a subscription-train model, which I really like: you pay for the subscription (which funds development and pays for support), but at any time you can _stop_ paying the subscription cost and keep the version you're currently running without further updates. That's a good trade-off to me, since I can choose to end my subscription without it becoming a catastrophic migration event that has to be carefully planned and executed fully before opting to stop paying.
No source - no pay. Even if source, in case the licensing scheme is subscription-based, there better be some service rendered that has recurring expenses, otherwise -- still no pay.
yes source - still no pay. What is the benefit in satisfying your demands? Code it yourself and make it open source.