> Is ChatGPT on par with a human child? A smart dog? Crows? A college professor? PhD level?

That presumes a total ordering of intelligence. I think the balance of evidence is that no such total ordering exists.

There are things chatgpt can do that children (or adults) cannot. There are thing that children can do that chatgpt cannot.

At best maybe the Turing test can give us a partial ordering.

I don't think there is much value in viewing "intelligence" as a whole. Its a combination of a multitude of factors, that need to be dealt with independently.