hello,
as always: imho. ...
idk. ... what do you mean by "managers" in your question!?
in my view: the "real" task of mangers - regardless of the level, but even more if they are at a lower/mid level - is managing peoples & their expectations - either of their "team" or their superior.
and looking at the current state of "AI", i don't see much gain in using it to manage those part of "management".
but i think (current) "AI" would be a good source of "additional" decision/reasoning over the lets call it "technical parts" of mgmt ...
sure, this will change in the future, but currently i don't see much on the horizon regarding the "peoples" part of mgmt.
but in the medium/long term, i could imagine a development somewhat similar to the following:
looking at the progression of neo-liberal capitalism: using / blaming AI for unfavorable (mgmt)decisions may be a good possibility to "hide" behind said AI to enforce such "unpopular" decision.
they would have been made anyways, but using this pattern "nobody" is responsible for such developments, because "AI said so" etc...
just my 0.02€
In my experience with medium to global enterprises, the vast majority of management are paper shuffling, fiefdom building incompetents that through their incessant demands of meetings and reports are actually a hindrance to delivering quality products and services on time and budget.