Those are great guidelines for never achieving anything relevant.
Also, the same ideas applied to dating rather than to code are what we call "incels/redpillers" and so on, so you might want to calm down a bit I think.
Those are great guidelines for never achieving anything relevant.
Also, the same ideas applied to dating rather than to code are what we call "incels/redpillers" and so on, so you might want to calm down a bit I think.
> Those are great guidelines for never achieving anything relevant.
Relevant to whom? Everything I've done is extremely relevant to me. I wouldn't have done those things if I didn't care about them.
> Also, the same ideas applied to dating rather than to code are what we call "incels/redpillers" and so on
I'd say it's more like MGTOW.
MGTOW are incels/redpillers though.
They're related but not the same. In this context, an "incel" would be someone who's incapable of contributing to projects despite wanting to. That's not my case.
If your contributions have all been rejected, it could be that they weren't as good as you think they were?
I've certainly made people angry when I rejected their buggy "improvements".
> If your contributions have all been rejected
They haven't.
I see your point though:
> it could be that they weren't as good as you think they were
Who knows. Maybe. Asked myself that question many times. Asked others.
It doesn't matter anymore. Now I only wonder if they are good enough for me.