Sulfur Hexafluoride and Nitrogen Trifluoride proliferate under a CO2 minimization regime. Nobody is arguing with Arrhenius proofs.
Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) is a potent greenhouse gas with a global warming potential (GWP) of 17,200 over a 100-year period, meaning it's 17,200 times more effective than carbon dioxide (CO2) in trapping heat in the atmosphere. This GWP value is used to calculate the CO2 equivalent of NF3 emissions.
Who said CO2?
Who came up with the idea that someones arguing with Arrhenius proofs?
What does our proof showing the existence of other greenhouse gases help us with?
Does any of this shed any light on whether it will be politically palatable to be doing fossil fuels i 20 years?