Hard to understand - why North Koreans being in open source a problem while Americans not? It wasnt North Korea who killed 1 million in Iraq. Its not North Korea who is protecting and arming Israel as it commits genocide.
If its because of 'authoritarianism', why do we not also designate the US as 'authoritarian' because, regardless of who the Americans vote for, the US keeps committing genocides?
(and no - being able to insult your leaders means nothing if whatever you do cant change the policy)
Americans that lie about their background and then proceed to steal your organization secrets, infect your co-workers and turn your company into a supply chain attack vector - are exactly the same type of the problem.
The thing is, it's somehow mostly (not only) North Koreans utilizing this particular tactics.
PS. They wouldn't allow you this rhetoric, regardless of you being sympathetic with them. It would be allowed only if you embrace the Juche and the Supreme Leader cult in fullest. Otherwise, you're nothing to them, an enemy, you don't deserve the Geneva convention or any of the basic human rights, by the doctrine's definition. The system there is not even like China's "One country, two systems", it's a thing on it's own.
> Americans that lie about their background and then proceed to steal your organization secrets, infect your co-workers and turn your company into a supply chain attack vector - are exactly the same type of the problem.
Like the diplomats and state dept. employees who Hillary Clinton ordered to do corporate spying in a memo, or is that any different...
With all the agents, backdoors, the legal power that the CIA has, why are American developers not a problem? It wasnt North Korea who ran 'rendition flights' or who does corporate spying and persecution. Its the US.
> PS. They wouldn't allow you this rhetoric, regardless of you being sympathetic with them
The US is persecuting those who oppose genocide right now. Those arguments are moot.
> Otherwise, you're nothing to them, an enemy, you don't deserve the Geneva convention or any of the basic human rights, by the doctrine's definition
Those like you who defend the Angloamerican establishment while it commits genocide and persecutes those who oppose it make everything more surreal. The US is doing everything you say right now. Where's the backlash and criticism? Where's the 'concern'?
[flagged]
> Americans can choose who they vote for
And yet, NOTHING changes. So, what does 'voting for' mean? North Koreans are not able to vote for more than one party, and yet they havent committed any genocide?
If every party that Americans vote for commits genocide, then its basically Americans are voting for that genocide or they dont care about the genocide at all.
Again, basically this is saying, 'We can just run our mouths, therefore we are not in an autocracy'. Tell all about that to Gazan children Israel is burning on live video.
This is a matter of value orientation
Some prioritize one over the other, while others hold the opposite view, and neither side can persuade or understand the other
> This is a matter of value orientation
Nah. Its a matter of those 'values' being just posturing in the Angloamerican West. Even if they are committing an actual genocide right now, they have 'better moral standing on human rights'. Not because they actually do. Its just posturing. And lying. For those dumb enough to buy into such rhetoric.